■ Last checked 22 September 2026
Kalpana vs Orshot
Both import from Figma and both work with AI agents. Orshot leads on API and no-code automation. Kalpana leads on catalog-driven campaigns and layout that re-runs per row.
| Kalpana | Orshot | |
|---|---|---|
| Figma import | Yes, keeps auto-layout | Yes, keeps layers, fonts and vectors |
| Auto-layout re-run per row | Yes | Not stated in their docs |
| Canva import | No | Yes |
| REST API | Yes | Yes |
| Zapier, Make and n8n apps | Not yet | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Entry paid plan | See pricing | $39 a month |
Choose Orshot if
- → You want ready-made n8n, Zapier and Make workflows.
- → You also need PDFs and document automation.
- → You want to import from Canva as well as Figma.
Choose Kalpana if
- → Your product titles and prices vary a lot and the layout has to adapt to each one.
- → You run catalog campaigns from Shopify or WooCommerce.
- → You want to proof every row visually before generating.
The short version
Orshot and Kalpana overlap more than most tools in this space: both take designs from Figma and both can be driven by AI agents. The difference is the job each is built around.
Orshot is built around automation: API calls, n8n workflows and agent tools. Kalpana is built around catalogs: many products, uneven data, several sizes, and a layout that has to hold up on every row.
How to decide
Run your messiest ten products through both. Long names, missing discounts and odd image ratios will show you the difference faster than any comparison page.
Which is better for developers?
Both have REST APIs and MCP servers. Orshot also has ready-made no-code apps and SDKs; Kalpana focuses on catalog campaigns and per-row layout.
Spotted something out of date? Email support@kalpana.one and we will fix it.
Ready when your catalog is
Run your next sale from one design.
Import a Figma frame, connect your catalog and preview every row before you spend a credit.